Thursday, November 6, 2014

NSPS and ALTA representatives met November 5

NSPS and ALTA representatives met November 5 at ALTA’s downtown District of Columbia offices to discuss the status of the ongoing review of the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey standards, and strategies for coordinating with Federal agencies regarding the appropriate use of the standards on projects for which they provide funding.




Pictured are: Kelly Lyn Romeo, ALTA Vice President; Curt Sumner, NSPS Executive Director; Michelle Korsmo, ALTA Chief Executive Officer; Gary Kent, NSPS ALTA/ACSM Committee Chair, and Joint ALTA/NSPS Committee Chair; Steve Gottheim, ALTA Legislative & Regulatory Counsel.  Also attending the meeting was NSPS Government Affairs consultant John Palatiello (not pictured)

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

ALTA/ACSM Question

Question:
I have a question that’s been bugging me, especially lately.  I have been getting Table A’s recently from some clients who are checking off items 20a and 20b.  I have been doing ALTA’s for years, but only recently have I been getting these items checked off.

I have spoken to several of my colleagues about it, particularly about 20b.  I get a different take on what needs to be done from everyone I talk to.

Can you tell me what your thoughts are regarding 20b?  I cannot get my head around what the limits of this might be, where do you stop?  And what is meant by the term “monument?”  I wonder if Lenders & Attorneys really understand what this means?

For reference, Table A, Item 20 reads as follows:

(a) Locate improvements within any offsite easements or servitudes benefitting the surveyed property that are disclosed in the Record Documents provided to the surveyor and that are observed in the process of conducting the survey (client to obtain necessary permissions). 
(b) Monuments placed (or a reference monument or witness to the corner) at all major corners of any offsite easements or servitudes benefitting the surveyed property and disclosed in Record Documents provided to the surveyor (client to obtain necessary permissions).

Response:
First and foremost it is important to remember that whether, and to what extent, any initially requested Table A items are to be addressed is to be negotiated between the responsible party (person/entity purchasing the survey) and the surveyor. The responsible party may very well be influenced by others (title company/attorney/etc.) regarding whether or not a particular Table A item is in fact desired/needed. Whether or not “lenders & attorneys really understand what is intended” by Table A items is a hard question to answer. It seems that often Table A items are initially requested, but dropped once the magnitude of the effort/cost to provide them is understood.

A key phrase here is “record documents provided to the surveyor”. This means that the surveyor is not required to exhaustively search out such documents during record research to collect boundary determination evidence.

20(a) is intended to basically treat (survey) off-site easements as if they were a fee parcel - locating improvements therein like fences, drives, observed evidence of utilities, etc.  But only within off-site easements that have been identified in documents provided to the surveyor.

20 (b) deals with setting a physical marker (iron pin/stake/etc., whatever is negotiated) at the major corners/break points along any easement/servitude that is “disclosed in the Record Documents”. A reason Item 20 (b) may be desired is to find out the physical limits of the easement or servitude.


The “client to obtain necessary permissions” phrase of course means the responsible party is to obtain permission (preferably written permission) from the owner for the surveyor to enter the offsite property upon which an easement or servitude lies.

Monday, November 3, 2014

NSPS PAC announces candidate support in November 4 election


The NSPS Political Action Committee (NSPS PAC) has distributed over $22,000 in support of 29 candidates for the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives for the November 4 election. The NSPS PAC distributed to 5 Senatorial re-election campaigns, 1 Senatorial candidate, 21 House Representative re-election campaigns, and 2 candidates for the House.
The NSPS PAC disbursements include:
Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK)
Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI)
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
Senate Candidate Thom Tillis (R-NC)
Rep. Don Young (R-AK)
Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA)
Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO)
Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID)
Rep. Jackie Walorski (R-IN)
Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-KS)
Rep. Vance McAllister (R-LA)
Rep. John Delaney (D-MD)
Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD)
Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI)
Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI)
Rep. John Kline (R-MN)
Rep. Sam Graves (R-MO)
Rep. Richard Hanna (R-NY)
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)
Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC)
Rep. Pat Meehan (R-PA)
Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC)
Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC)
Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT)
Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV)
House Candidate Donald Norcross (D-NJ)

House Candidate David Rouzer (R-NC)

Friday, October 31, 2014

NSPS Young Surveyors Network


We would like to introduce the NSPS Young Surveyors Network to you!
 
The NSPS Young Surveyors Network is just getting its feet on the ground and we appreciate the fact that you are interested in helping, supporting and just being a part of it. We are excited to see what we can accomplish together and the benefits we will bring to the surveying profession and our future.
 
The NSPS Young Surveyors Network is modeled after the International Federation of Surveyors (FIG) Young Surveyors Network. Our aim is to establish a national network of Young Surveyors within NSPS and its affiliate organizations.
 
The FIG Young Surveyors Network was started by a working group created in 2006 at the Munich FIG Congress. The reason that this working group was started in the first place was to bring more young surveyors into the network in FIG and because of the age structure within the surveying community. In 2009, the working group was upgraded to a Young Surveyors Network and has been building ever since. A main focus of the group has been on networking and getting to know more people. This helps to expand our personal network, professional network and continues to entice people to be involved in the movement as we believe this is a strong motivator for many.
 
The NSPS Young Surveyors are defined by surveyors aged 35 years or under, students of surveying or those surveyors within 10 years of graduating from a Bachelor or Master’s Degree. Every surveyor is welcome to join to the group; however the focus is to provide support for those individuals that meet the definition.
 
Our first meeting was held in San Diego on April 14th and 15th, 2014. We had over 20 participants and were very encouraged by the ideas, comments and visions we were able to discuss. During these 2 days, we established our Mission, Vision and Organizational structure. We realize that these will change and evolve over time, but you have to start somewhere.
 
Young Surveyors Tool Kit Click Here
 
Stay Connected to the NSPS Young Surveyors Group!!!
 
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/NSPSYS
Twitter: @NSPSYoung
LinkedIn: NSPS Young Surveyors
NSPS Coordinator: Amanda.Askren@gmail.com
NSPS Liasion: Frank.Lenik@leicaus.com
 
Stay Connected to the FIG Young Surveyors Group!!!
 
FIG Young Surveyors Homepage: http://fig.net/ys/index.htm
Facebook:  FIG Young Surveyors
Twitter: @FIG_Young
LinkedIn: FIG Young Surveyors Network

NSPS Radio Hour — Nov. 3, 11 a.m. EDT



NSPS Radio Hour — Nov. 3, 11 a.m. EDT
When Mike Brown participated in the NSPS Trig-Star program in 1998 as a high school student, it convinced him to switch his career focus from engineering to surveying. He is now a Professional Surveyor who is licensed in multiple states. Join Mike as he talks with host Curt Sumner about his journey.

If you are unable to listen to the show when it is being broadcast, listen to the archive of the show at
http://www.radiosandysprings.com/showpages/ACSM.php. Archives for each show are typically available for listening within a few days after the show airs.

During the show, listen for the "key question" and be the first to email the correct answer to
quikstakescontest@americaswebradio.com to win a $50 gift certificate from our sponsor, Parker Davis Quik Stakes. No purchase is required to receive the gift certificate. Winners limited to once every three months.

Monday, October 20, 2014

GAO says U.S. DOT can improve tracking of highway spending

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported on the Highway Trust Fund, finding that in fiscal year 2013, operating administrations within the Department of Transportation (DOT) collected and reported some information on the types of activities and administrative expenses funded from the Highway Trust Fund, but did so with varying levels of detail. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) obligated about $41 billion in fiscal year 2013, most of which ($39 billion) was apportioned to states through the federal-aid highway program. FHWA tracks federal-aid highway program obligations in its Fiscal Management Information System (FMIS) for individual project segments or contracts. This process allows FHWA to collect and report information on the types of activities (such as obligations for the construction of new roads or bridges) funded with Highway Trust Fund monies. Ultimately, GAO recommended that U.S. DOT improve transparency and provide Congress and the public greater visibility into the types of highway activities funded with Highway Trust Fund monies, and that the Secretary of Transportation should direct the FHWA Administrator to explore the costs, feasibility, and options for collecting and publicly reporting consistent aggregate project-level spending data.

Friday, October 17, 2014

NSPS Radio Hour — Oct. 20, 11 a.m. EDT

http://www.multibriefs.com/briefs/nsps/curtsumner.jpg

NSPS Past President Bob Dahn will join host Curt Sumner for a discussion about the “Innocent Surveying Mistake” that made national headlines earlier this year related to the placement of a $1.9 million home on the wrong property in Rhode Island. However, it wasn’t a mistake made by a surveyor.




Listen to learn the facts.


If you are unable to listen to the show when it is being broadcast, listen to the archive of the show at http://www.radiosandysprings.com/showpages/ACSM.php. Archives for each show are typically available for listening within a few days after the show airs.

During the show, listen for the "key question" and be the first to email the correct answer to quikstakescontest@americaswebradio.com to win a $50 gift certificate from our sponsor, Parker Davis Quik Stakes. No purchase is required to receive the gift certificate. Winners limited to once every three months.