Among
the actions taken during the recent (August 21-22) NCEES annual business
meetings, three are of particular interest to the surveying profession. Two of the
three are reported on the NCEES website, and are related to the NCEES Model Law prerequisite education and
experience requirements for licensure as a professional engineers. The third
action (unfortunately not reported on the NCEES website) relates to a motion
which was briefly discussed during the Surveyors Forum, but introduced
individually during the business meeting by Richard Smith who sits on the New
Jersey licensing board. The basic gist to the motion is that the NCEES Model
Law should not include an “exception” for what are known as “engineering
surveys”. Smith argued that in order for licensed professional engineers to
perform “incidental” surveying that is related to engineering projects they
undertake, they must meet the education, experience, and examination
requirements for licensure as a professional surveyor. Several other surveyor
board members spoke on the issue, and a couple of amendments were offered. Some
of the comments pointed out that education leading to licensure as a
professional engineer includes virtually no components related to the practice
of surveying. In the end, though, the concept failed by a significant margin.
NSPS
News & Views hopes to be able to provide more in depth information about this matter
in future editions.